To run an AI model on your own computer you need a runner: the software that loads the model and serves it to you or your apps. The five most popular are Ollama, LM Studio, Jan, llama.cpp and vLLM. They overlap a lot (four of them are built on or around llama.cpp), but each suits a different kind of user. This guide compares them as of September 2026 and helps you pick. If your shortlist is already down to the two most popular, our side-by-side on Ollama vs LM Studio goes further on the one difference that decides it: a background API against a desktop application.
Quick Recommendations
- Easiest overall: LM Studio. It’s a polished desktop app with a built-in model browser.
- Best for developers and command-line users: Ollama. It’s simple, scriptable and integrates with many tools.
- Best open-source desktop app: Jan.
- Maximum control and performance tuning: llama.cpp.
- Serving many users on NVIDIA/AMD GPUs: vLLM.
Comparison Table
| Runner | Interface | Engine | Platforms | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ollama (v0.33 series) | CLI + desktop app + API | llama.cpp-based, plus MLX on Mac | macOS, Windows, Linux | Developers, integrations (Continue, Cline, Open WebUI) |
| LM Studio (0.4.x) | Desktop GUI + local server + SDKs | llama.cpp (GGUF) and MLX on Apple Silicon | macOS, Windows (incl. ARM), Linux | Beginners and power users who want a GUI |
| Jan (0.8.x) | Open-source desktop app + API | llama.cpp | macOS, Windows, Linux | Users who want a fully open-source, offline app |
| llama.cpp | CLI + llama-server |
Itself (GGUF) | Almost everything (CPU, CUDA, Metal, Vulkan, ROCm) | Tinkerers, maximum configurability |
| vLLM | Python server (OpenAI-compatible API) | Its own GPU engine (PagedAttention) | Linux-first, NVIDIA/AMD GPUs | High-throughput serving to many users |
Ollama
Ollama makes running a model a one-liner (ollama run qwen3:8b) and exposes a local API that many tools support out of the box. 2026 releases have added MLX support for Apple Silicon, faster time-to-first-token and a desktop app. Its main downsides: less fine-grained control than raw llama.cpp, and a conservative default context length, which you should raise for coding and document work.
LM Studio
LM Studio is the most beginner-friendly option. Since July 2026 it also has a separate agent app, LM Studio Bionic. You search for a model, download it and chat, and it shows which quantizations fit your hardware. To rank every model against your machine at once, llmfit does it from the terminal. It supports both GGUF (llama.cpp) and Apple’s MLX format, can run as a headless local server, and offers JavaScript and Python SDKs and MCP tool support. It’s free, but it isn’t open source.
Jan
Jan is an open-source ChatGPT-style desktop app that runs models locally with llama.cpp and serves an OpenAI-compatible API on your machine. Recent versions added MCP tool support and other quality-of-life features. Choose Jan if open-source software matters to you.
llama.cpp
llama.cpp is the engine underneath much of the local-AI world. Using it directly gives you every option: GPU layer offloading, KV cache quantization, speculative decoding, the full range of quantization types and a built-in web UI through llama-server. It’s the best choice for squeezing maximum performance from unusual hardware, but it’s the least beginner-friendly.
vLLM
vLLM is built for serving: it handles many simultaneous requests efficiently on NVIDIA and AMD GPUs, supports FP8/FP4 formats and scales across multiple GPUs. It’s excellent for a team server or an app backend, but it’s overkill for one person chatting on a laptop, and it’s primarily Linux-based. Recent releases added support for new models such as DeepSeek V4 and Gemma 4.
Does the Runner Change Speed?
For a single user, speed is mostly limited by your hardware’s memory bandwidth, and runners built on the same engine perform similarly. Differences come from engine choice (MLX vs llama.cpp on Mac), default settings (context size, GPU offload) and features like speculative decoding. vLLM pulls ahead when serving many requests at once. We haven’t run our own benchmarks. For measured comparisons, see the llama.cpp and vLLM project benchmarks. To estimate speed on your hardware, see the Local Hardware Matrix.
Also Worth Knowing: llamafile
One more option does not fit the table above, because it is not an app you install. llamafile packages the llama.cpp engine and a model into a single executable file that runs on macOS, Linux, Windows and the BSDs with no setup step, which suits offline machines, USB drives and handing a working model to someone else. Our llamafile guide covers the commands, the GPU flags and the 4GB size limit on Windows.
Which Should You Pick?
- New to local AI: start with LM Studio.
- Want to connect an editor or app: use Ollama. See our local coding assistant guide, and our pick of the best local LLMs for coding.
- Prefer open source: choose Jan or llama.cpp.
- Serving a team: use vLLM on a GPU server.
- Want one file and no install: use llamafile.
Before downloading, check that a model fits with the VRAM Calculator or the Model Recommender.
FAQ
Is Ollama or LM Studio faster?
On the same hardware and model format they’re usually close. On a Mac, MLX models (available in LM Studio and now Ollama) can be faster than GGUF.
Are these runners free?
Yes. All five are free to use. Ollama, Jan, llama.cpp and vLLM are open source, while LM Studio is free but proprietary.
Sources
Ollama, LM Studio changelog, Jan changelog, llama.cpp, vLLM blog.
Updated September 11, 2026: updated for current runner versions, and removed earlier benchmark claims that weren’t from our own testing.
Work out what your hardware can actually run
Free calculators and directories, sized from real model weights — before you download gigabytes or order a card:

